Archives
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- June 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- June 2002
- January 2002
- January 2001
- May 2000
- April 2000
Categories
Meta
Trackbacks and Pingbacks
-
[...] Why Corporate Computing is Destined for the Cloud – Have Mac Will Blog [...]
Why Corporate Computing is Destined for the Cloud
The question I’m currently struggling with is:
Is there really such a thing as a private cloud?
The term “Private Cloud” is proving attractive to quite a few CIOs. The private cloud idea is to implement a “cloud architecture” within the data center on a sensible collection of (possibly new) resources. You then deploy applications into that architecture. Such applications will then be “cloud ready” and you may, at some future point, be able to deploy those applications into commercial clouds.
Assuming you adopt an architecture that matches and can interface with some provider(s) of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) there’s lots of sense in this:
Having said that, the private cloud will have little relevance to any Platform-as-a-Service or Software-as-a-Service operations, because (with very few exceptions) they run proprietary environments. (This may change in time, but don’t start counting chickens yet.)
So what does a private cloud look like? Well, it looks like a set of virtualized resources, because that’s what it is. And that means it looks like a whole set of consolidated servers – hopefully with a good set of management software for managing the virtual resources. Conceptually, there’s little difference between a private cloud and a set of virtualized resources. A “private cloud” may include some interface software, which connects to an external IaaS service. But that’s it really. Private Cloud is marketing speak; although you might want, need and gainfully employ what lies beneath.
So let’s look at the graph. First thing to say is that the Y-axis is logarithmic. And that means that the curve is an awful lot steeper than it looks; much much steeper. The Y-axis shows user populations from 1 to a billion. If the axis wasn’t logarithmic, it would need to be about 6000 miles long, not the 3 inches long, that it is.